Dimethylsulfoxide formulation in mixture with additive for lowering the crystallization point of same, and applications of said mixture

ABSTRACT

Use of at least one diol and/or of at least one triol as a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) additive for lowering the crystallization point thereof. The DMSO formulation is used in combination with the abovementioned additive as a paint-stripping composition, a surface-cleaning composition, a graffiti-cleaning composition, a surface-cleaning composition in the microelectronics field, such as a photoresist stripper, a DMSO-based agrochemical composition, or as a constituent of an abovementioned composition, as a polymer-dissolving solvent, or as a constituent of a composition that is useful in the field of cosmetology or pharmacy.

The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/525,602, filed Oct. 13, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,767, which is the U.S. National Phase application of PCT International Application No. PCT/FR2008/050127, filed Jan. 28, 2008, and claims priority to French Patent Application No. 07.53055, filed Feb. 5, 2007, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

The present invention relates to dimethyl sulfoxide and to its various uses. The invention relates to the use of a mixture of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with an additive for lowering the crystallization point thereof without impairing its efficacy for the usual uses thereof, such as, but without being limited to, paint stripping and the cleaning of surfaces and graffiti. The invention also relates to stripping and cleaning compositions comprising such a mixture.

DMSO, a very polar solvent, is particularly suitable for formulating paint strippers generally in combination with a moderately polar cosolvent, such as an ether, a ketone, an ester, etc., which makes it possible to maintain the efficacy of DMSO while reducing the cost of the mixture. Certain combinations lead to true synergistic results, which, depending on the type of paint and on its degree of ageing, are equivalent or similar to the efficacy of the standard combination: methylene chloride+methanol (Double Liaison, Physique et Chimie des Peintures et Adhésifs No. 467-468, 1995 <<Nouveaux décapants à base de DMSO®>> [Double Bond, Physics and Chemistry of Paints and Adhesives—No. 467-468, 1995: “Novel DMSO-based strippers”], J. P. Lallier. It may be noted that protic solvents, i.e. solvents comprising an X—H organic function, X possibly being O, N or S, such as water and alcohols, are not indicated as cosolvents.

However, one drawback of DMSO is its excessively high crystallization point, equal to 18° C., which leads to storage problems, especially when outdoors in winter, and to handling problems at low temperature.

It is known that water can lower the crystallization point of DMSO: a 92.5/7.5 (w/w) DMSO/water mixture has a crystallization point of 0° C. However, the addition of water to a DMSO-based formulation entails a certain number of problems relating to the formulation and to the application:

-   -   during formulation, the water associates very strongly with the         DMSO, giving rise to a highly hydrophilic and polar phase, and         demixing very often arises during the addition of the cosolvent,         which is, itself, aprotic and less polar;     -   in the presence of water, DMSO often shows a loss of efficacy,         DMSO-water combinations leading to molecular aggregates with a         low rate of diffusion;     -   the presence of water often results in thickening problems, in         particular with cellulose-based thickeners.

Certain monoalcohols also have a good capacity for reducing the crystallization point of DMSO. In general, these alcohols of petrochemical origin are hazard-labelled as being irritant, harmful or toxic and introduce flammability, which is detrimental with respect to DMSO that is free of any hazard labelling.

Formulators are thus currently obliged to use a special installation for heating DMSO drums or to store them and use them in heated premises.

The Applicant Company has sought to solve this problem, and it has found that the addition of diols and/or triols in a content less than the content of a cosolvent in the DMSO, which is usually from 50 to 90 parts by weight of cosolvent in a DMSO+cosolvent mixture, can very efficiently lower the crystallization point of DMSO. Thus, an 80/20 (w/w) DMSO+glycerol mixture has a crystallization point of 0° C.

Furthermore, and unexpectedly, this addition of diol(s) and/or triol(s) allows the production of a mixture that is miscible with the usual, less polar, cosolvents and does not impair the stripping efficacy of DMSO formulated with the diol and/or triol, in contrast with the case where DMSO is formulated with water.

The present invention is thus based on the principle:

-   -   of combining DMSO with an organic compound that contains several         hydroxyl groups, promoting the lowering of the crystallization         point of DMSO, and which is carbon-based, affording good         miscibility with the other conventional organic constituents of         stripping and cleaning compositions, such as solvents and         activators, and avoiding demixing by moisture uptake (which         takes place with water); and     -   of producing this combination with a diol and/or triol content         that is high enough for efficient lowering of the         crystallization point to take place, without, however, reaching         the contents of a cosolvent, for which function an alcohol is         not recommended since it impairs the stripping efficacy.

Cryobiology (1978), 15(1), 93-108, Boutron P. and Kaufmann A. cites a DMSO+glycerol mixture (10/1 by weight) that is better than pure DMSO for avoiding the crystallization of a eutectic during slow cooling. The said publication does not mention that this mixture is advantageous for lowering the crystallization point of DMSO.

WO 03/048 393 A1 (PCT/IT 01/00611) describes the use of DMSO+glycerol mixtures in an entirely different application, namely the preparation of buffer solutions for the polymerase chain amplification of DNA.

JP 1986-308848 describes, for the microelectronics industry, as a photoresist stripper, a DMSO+propylene glycol mixture used at 100° C. Photoresist stripper formulations are often mixtures based on a dipolar aprotic solvent such as N-methylpyrrolidone or DMSO and a glycol ether. The latter solvent does not serve to lower the crystallization point of the active solvent when it is DMSO. In particular, U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,748, U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,747 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,395,479 mention mixtures based on NMP and diethylene glycol methyl ether. Patent JP 01042653 mentions mixtures based on DMSO and a diethylene glycol monoalkyl ether.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,323 and US 2001/0 034 313 A1 describe photoresist cleaning and stripping compositions based on a solvent and an alkanolamine among the list of possible solvents are DMSO, ethylene glycol and propylene glycol. DMSO+diol mixtures are not illustrated.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an image of a paint-stripping test using pure dimethyl sulfoxide.

FIG. 2 is an image of a paint-stripping test using 90 parts by weight of dimethyl sulfoxide and 10 parts by weight of glycerol.

FIG. 3 is an image of a paint-stripping test using 90 parts by weight of dimethyl sulfoxide and 10 parts by weight of water.

FIG. 4 is an image of a paint-stripping test using 30 parts by weight of dimethyl sulfoxide and 70 parts by weight of methyl ethyl ketone.

FIG. 5 is an image of a paint-stripping test using 27 parts by weight of dimethyl sulfoxide, 3 parts by weight of glycerol, and 70 parts by weight methyl ethyl ketone.

A first subject of the present invention is thus the use of at least one diol and/or at least one trial as a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) additive for lowering the crystallization point thereof.

The diol(s) may be chosen from ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and hexylene glycol, and the triol(s) may be chosen from glycerol and 2-ethyl-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol.

Mention may be made more particularly of glycerol as a DMSO additive. Glycerol is a “green” additive, which does not lead to any hazard labelling for the DMSO+glycerol combination, DMSO already being free of hazard labelling.

Water may be added to the diol(s) and/or triol(s), in which case sodium chloride may also be added.

The glycerol+water (90/10 w/w) mixture introduced at 20 parts by weight into DMSO (80/18/2 by weight DMSO+glycerol+water mixture) allows lowering of the crystallization point to −2° C. In this case, the water content is only 2% by weight, which does not in any way impair the miscibility properties or the stripping or cleaning efficacy in the case of stripping or cleaning compositions. To achieve this crystallization point using pure water, a water content of 8.5% by weight is needed, which may give rise to demixing problems in certain cases and to inhibition of the stripping or cleaning efficacy.

In the case of the present invention, the amount of water introduced will thus be less than that which gives rise to demixing phenomena in the presence of a cosolvent and to inhibition of the efficacy.

It is also possible to use DMSO+glycerol+water and DMSO+glycerol+water+sodium chloride mixtures, using, if so desired, water+glycerol or glycerol+sodium chloride mixtures, respectively, obtained from industrial manufacture (for example industrial glycerol-containing water formed of about 80% by weight of glycerol+10% by weight of water+10% by weight of sodium chloride). The sodium chloride has the property of further retarding the crystallization.

The DMSO additive may thus be formed, per 100 parts by weight, of

-   (A) 75 to 100 parts by weight of diol(s) and/or triol(s); -   (B) 0 to 15 parts by weight of water; and -   (C) 0 to 10 parts by weight of sodium chloride, which may be present     only if water is present.

Moreover, the additive constituted by the diol(s) and the triol(s) optionally with the water and the chloride, where appropriate, may represent 5 to 40 parts by weight and in particular 10 to 30 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of supplemented DMSO.

The present invention also relates to a formulation of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in combination with the additive as defined above.

The invention also relates to the use of the formulation as defined above as a paint-stripping composition, a surface-cleaning composition, a graffiti-cleaning composition, a surface-cleaning composition in the microelectronics field, such as a photoresist stripper, a DMSO-based agrochemical composition, or as a constituent of an abovementioned composition, as a polymer-dissolving solvent, or as a constituent of a composition that is useful in the field of cosmetology or pharmacy.

The invention also relates to a composition for stripping paints or for cleaning surfaces or graffiti, characterized in that it comprises, per 100 parts by weight of (A)+(B):

-   (A) 10 to 50 parts by weight of the formulation as defined above;     and -   (B) 90 to 50 parts by weight of at least one cosolvent chosen from     aprotic cosolvents of moderate polarity, especially from ethers,     such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and anisole, ketones such as     methyl ethyl ketone, and esters such as butyl acetate and dibasic     esters (mixtures of dimethyl adipate, glutarate and succinate),     and, where appropriate, the usual additives, such as activators,     thickeners, softeners and surfactants.

The activators may be chosen from amines and alkanolamines and may be used at up to 10 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the DMSO formulation according to the invention+cosolvent(s). The thickeners may be chosen from cellulose-based or acrylic thickeners and may be used at up to 5 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the DMSO formulation according to the invention+cosolvent(s).

Finally, the invention relates to a process for stripping paints or for cleaning surfaces or graffiti, characterized in that the stripping or cleaning composition as defined above is applied to the painted surface to be stripped or to the surface to be cleaned or freed of its graffiti, using a brush, the applied composition is left on for 30 minutes, and the flakes of paint and soiling or graffiti are then removed using a paint spatula.

The examples that follow illustrate the present invention without, however, limiting its scope. In the examples, the following abbreviations have been used:

-   DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide -   MEK: methyl ethyl ketone

EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of a Glycerol-Containing Dimethyl Sulfoxide

A chemical composition having the following formulation, per 100 parts by weight, was prepared:

-   -   90 parts by weight of DMSO; and     -   10 parts by weight of glycerol.

The crystallization point of this composition is about 10° C. This value may be compared with the crystallization point of pure DMSO, which is +18° C.

Paint-Stripping Tests:

This formulation was used to soak at room temperature a piece of cotton wool placed on a wooden board (plywood) coated with a glyptal paint. After 30 minutes of contact, the cotton wool was removed and the plywood was observed at this place.

The same stripping test was performed firstly with pure DMSO and secondly with a formulation containing 90 parts by weight of DMSO and 10 parts by weight of water.

The visual results of these three tests may be seen in FIGS. 1 to 3. It may be seen that, while water has an inhibitory effect on stripping (FIG. 3), this is not the case for glycerol (FIG. 2). Thus, the stripping effect is substantially the same for pure DMSO (FIG. 1) and for the DMSO+glycerol (90/10 w/w) mixture.

EXAMPLE 2 Preparation of a Glycerol-Containing DMSO+MEK Stripping Composition

Glycerol-containing DMSO was formulated with MEK in the following proportions:

-   -   glycerol-containing DMSO: 30% by weight; and     -   MEK: 70% by weight.

A reference formulation was prepared:

-   -   DMSO: 30% by weight; and     -   MEK: 70% by weight.

The same stripping test as in Example 1 was performed with each of these two formulations.

The visual results of these tests may be seen in FIGS. 4 and 5. The effect is the same in both cases, namely the formation of flakes lifted from the support, which is a sign of good stripping efficacy. It is thus confirmed that glycerol has no inhibitory effect on stripping. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. Composition for stripping paints or for cleaning surfaces or graffiti, characterized in that it comprises, per 100 parts by weight of (A)+(B): (A) 10 to 50 parts by weight of a formulation comprising an additive and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), wherein the additive comprises 5 to 40 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of said formulation, and the additive comprises, per 100 parts by weight of said additive: (a) 75 to 100 parts by weight of diol and/or triol; (b) 0 to 15 parts by weight of water; and (c) 0 to 10 parts by weight of sodium chloride, wherein sodium chloride is present only if water is present; and (B) 90 to 50 parts by weight of at least one cosolvent selected from ketones, and, optionally additives, selected from the group consisting of activators, thickeners, softeners and surfactants.
 2. Composition of claim 1 wherein said composition further comprises at least one aprotic cosolvents of moderate polarity selected from the group consisting of ethers and anisole.
 3. Composition of claim 2, wherein said ether is methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE).
 4. Composition of claim 1 wherein said ketone is methyl ethyl ketone.
 5. Composition of claim 1 wherein said composition further comprises at least one ester selected from the group consisting of butyl acetate and dibasic esters. 